Visual journal
Review loop study
A visual note on keeping human review inside AI-assisted systems.
I keep returning to loops rather than pipelines when I think about AI workflows. The useful systems are the ones that can surface a draft, invite correction, and then fold that correction back into the shared map without pretending the machine has become the decision-maker.
The journal should make this kind of connection easy to see: a drawing, a short reflection, and then a path into the related work or reading. That is more useful than a static gallery because it keeps the image tied to the thinking that produced it.
Related reading
- There Is No Antimemetics Division
- Human-centered AI workflows